Previous Page:
2.2 Linear Footprint
Next Page:
2.4 Interior Native Habitat

Scroll for more

Getting Started

Navigating the Report


Main Menu

The main menu is accessed through the hamburger menu in the "bookmark" on the left-hand side of the page. This report is divided into 8 chapters. From this menu, you can access each of the main chapters, their sub-sections, or search for something specific.

Tip: The down arrowhead expands when you are viewing a Chapter within the hamburger menu. You can quickly navigate to any Section within a Chapter by making a selection from the expanded menu.

Page by Page

The "page turner" arrows at the bottom left-hand of your screen will sequentially take you through the report, page by page. For example, press the right arrow to move from Section 1.1 to Section 1.2.

 

Tip: If you’re interested in the full Norbord Report, we encourage you to start with the Introduction found in Chapter 1, and use the page turner function (arrows on the bottom left of the page) to sequentially navigate through the report.


image

This icon on the left menu is your guide on how to navigate the report content. You can access this at any time without leaving the current page you’re on.

Photo: mini_malist

Vegetation Type: Status & Trend

In this section we summarize the status and trend of vegetation types in Norbord's operating areas.

The status of undisturbed deciduous and mixedwood forest, circa 2018, was:

Northern Operating Area

Deciduous = 23.8% |  Mixedwood = 4.7%

image

Southern Operating Area

Deciduous = 29.8% |  Mixedwood = 7.8%

image

Introduction

“Coarse-filter” management is one tool recommended for maintaining biodiversity in managed landscapes. By managing for vegetation (forest) types in patterns and amounts similar to natural disturbance such as fire and insect outbreaks, it is more likely that many components of biodiversity will also be maintained. Therefore, documenting and mapping vegetation types is critical to understanding how human activity, including forestry, is affecting ecosystems, and to supporting sustainable, evidence-based land-use decisions (e.g., forest management planning)[1]. Tracking vegetation types is important to:

  • detect changes in the extent and distribution of native vegetation, 
  • develop species-habitat association models, and 
  • explain trends in biodiversity. 

Native vegetation is summarized for Norbord’s operating areas, including vegetation type, amount, and trend. This “coarse-filter” monitoring of native vegetation complements the “fine-filter” monitoring of species by providing detailed information on habitat changes, a main driver of species changes.

image Photo: Dano

Results

Area of Native Vegetation Types

Major vegetation types differ between the Northern and Southern Operating Areas because of the different ecosystem types that predominate in each landbase.

  • In the Northern Operating Area, which is located entirely in the Boreal Forest Natural Region, the majority of the landbase is covered by the following forest stand types: deciduous (23.8%), black spruce (21.3%), white spruce (4.9%), mixedwood (4.7%), and pine (2.3%).
  • Non-harvestable vegetation types are common in the Northern Operating Area including non-forested vegetation cover (20.2%) and treed fen (14.0%).
  • In the Southern Operating Area, which overlaps three natural regions (Boreal Forest, Foothills, and Rocky Mountains), almost 60% of the landbase is covered by the following forest stand types: deciduous (29.8%), white spruce (8.9%), mixedwood (7.8%), pine (6.8%), and black spruce (5.6%).
  • Non-harvestable vegetation types cover small areas including non-forested vegetation (5.6%) and treed fen (5.0%).
Figure: Status of Vegetation. Per cent (%) area, circa 2018, of broad stand types in the Northern Operating Area and Southern Operating Area. Hover over the bar or Legend to view the per cent area of each vegetation type.

Results

Trend in Native Vegetation Types

Major vegetation types differ between the Northern and Southern Operating Areas because of the different ecosystem types that predominate in each landbase.

  • Pine and deciduous forests showed the largest declines in the Southern Operating Area; pine decreased by 7.1 percentage points (13.8% to 6.6%) and deciduous decreased by 3.8 percentage points (33.4% to 29.5%) between 2000 and 2019. 
  • Except for white spruce (2.1%), all forest types in the Northern Operating Area had declines < 1.5 percentage points between 2000 and 2019.
  • Forest harvest is a driver of decreases in deciduous, mixedwood, white spruce, and pine stand types.

Deciduous forest
Photo: Arthur Chapman

Figure: Vegetation Trend. The trend in the per cent (%) area of broad stand types over time in the Northern Operating Area and Southern Operating Area between 1950 and 2019. Trend data is available for 1950 and 1980, and missing 2002-2003. The trend table summarizes the most recent changes over 2000-2019. Dotted lines account for contributions from recovering forestry areas. Hover over categories in the Legend to highlight the corresponding trend line. Hover over trend lines in the figure to see data values.

References

1.

Noss, R.F. 1999. Assessing and monitoring forest biodiversity: A suggested framework and indicators. Forest Ecology and Management 115(1999):135-146.

This report is in partnership with